A model for developing a decision support system to simulate national drug policy indicators
نویسندگان
چکیده
To help save lives and improve human health, it is crucial for policy makers to ensure equity in access to drugs, drug efficacy, quality and safety, and rational use of drugs, which are indicators of the National Drug Policy (NDP) in evaluation of pharmaceutical system performance in every country. There are some retrospective evaluation methods that are currently used to appraise the success of NDP and adherence to its objectives in the relevant countries. Nikfar et al. (2005) for the first time designed a weighted questionnaire system by a nominal group technique based on the answers to the questions for adding a single drug to the National Drug List (NDL). They found that although the system, structures, and mechanisms are in place, they do not function properly in some topics. Assessment of 59 dossiers of approved drugs for adding to the NDL during a 5-year period showed that decision makers pay more attention to efficacy, safety, and rationality in use rather than accessibility and affordability. Nikfar et al. (2005) concluded that every country must establish a survey system to check implementation of the processes to achieve the NDP's objectives of better protection of public health and equal access to pharmaceuticals [1]. Our belief is that the problem is still there and has not been resolved yet by the national drug authority (NDA) and the objectives of national drug policies (NDP) have not been met yet [2]. Adding or deleting medicines from the essential lists, establishing national formularies, registering the health professionals, facilities and goods, financial interventions, pricing and reimbursement, supervising the supply chain, pharmacovigilance, regulating advertising, and promoting rational drug use are some of the daily decisions that are made by NDAs. On the other hand, some factors in the market such as product specifications, prices, supply system and promotion affect the decisions. Furthermore, the cost of drugs is a hurdle for utilization as despite availability it affects accessibility [3-5]. These mixed variables complicate decisions that are needed to be made even in uncertain conditions. The NDAs usually cannot predict and Corresponding author: Prof. Mohammad Abdollahi Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center Faculty of Pharmacy Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran E-mail: mohammad.abdollahi@ utoronto.ca Editorial
منابع مشابه
A Bayesian model decision support system: dryland salinity management application
Addressing environmental management problems at catchment scales requires an integrated modelling approach, in which key bio-physical and socio-economic drivers, processes and impacts are all considered. Development of Decision Support Systems (DSSs) for environmental management is rapidly progressing. This paper describes the integration of physical, ecological, and socio-economic components i...
متن کاملPursuing International Competitiveness in Iranian Wheat Policy
After the war with Iraq which ended in 1988, Iran implemented several agricultural support policies based on Five-Year National Development Plans. The main objective of these plans in the agriculture sector was to make the agricultural economy more market-oriented and to encourage sustainable agriculture. This paper investigates the extent to which Iran's government has been able to achieve thi...
متن کاملDesigning a decision support system to predict the success of research centers with discriminatory analysis DEA
Research centers have an important place in promoting science and technology nationwide. On the other hand, given the limitations in allocating the funds and the facilities needed to establish these centers, it is important to decide on the selection of priority centers. In this decision - making process, several factors, such as requirements, priorities and strategies, capabilities, and balanc...
متن کاملDelving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Initiatives to engage the public in health policy decisions have been widely endorsed and used, yet agreed upon methods for systematically evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives remain to be developed. Dukhanin, Topazian, and DeCamp have thus developed a useful taxonomy of evaluation criteria derived from a systematic review of published evaluation tools that might serve as the basis...
متن کاملDevelopment of decision support tool for municipal solid waste management system in Iran based on life cycle assessment approach
Background and Objective: Various aspects including the environmental burdens, social and economic consequences of the waste management(WM) scenarios must be considered to come up with a comprehensive WM plan. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach is a systematic method to quantify the environmental burdens of each WM scenario. Materials and Methods: This study used an LCA approach to develop a...
متن کامل